Just when the waves of nausea were subsiding from news reports about the unprecedented president elect’s new government website and the selection of a pit bull for chief of staff, America awakes to the specter of porting our country’s most debauched ideologies to the international community.
Based on its own mission statement, “The U.S. Department of State manages America’s relationships with foreign governments, international organizations, and the people of other countries,” it is apparent that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s selection is a disaster waiting to happen.
For those readers who think I am criticizing Clinton, well, you’re correct in this instance. In fact, the first thing that strikes me about this selection is payola. “Campaign for me and you get the plum job.”
So let’s take a jog down memory lane and look at just some of HRC’s public thoughts as a Washington insider:
“I’m not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president.” HRC
“If I want to knock a story off the front page, I just change my hairstyle.” HRC
“In the Bible it says they asked Jesus how many times you should forgive, and he said 70 times 7. Well, I want you all to know that I’m keeping a chart.” HRC
“Let’s not leave an educational vacuum to be filled by religious extremists who go to families who have no other option and offer meals, housing and some form of education. If we are going to combat extremism then we must educate those very same children.” HRC
“We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.” HRC
Interesting thoughts indeed.
Since when did a special-interest pandering democrat give a second thought about what’s good for society? Are we supposed to accept the gay community’s hate as good for society? Are we supposed to accept coddling those who are primarily responsible for new HIV infection (73%) as best for society? Are we supposed to accept her denigration of caring Americans because they don’t keep a chart of those who wrong them (but continue to give of themselves) as best for our country? Are we supposed to accept a confessed media manipulator as what is best for our country and our allies? Are we going to accept a thought process that argues her spousal privilege equates to a co-presidency and is best for our country?
If we answer in the affirmative to any of these questions, we’re really missing the point of what is best for the country.
As the country’s Secretary of State, HRC will wield great power and influence among our allies and foes alike for years to come. And, considering her past equivocation concerning abortion (she’s never met anyone who is pro-abortion, just pro-choice), we should all be shaking our heads at her condescension. Because it doesn’t matter what semantic device one employs if the result is the same — dead children!
So this morning, America awakes to The One having formed an alliance with the Great Equivocator to advance The One’s radical abortion agenda worldwide. This ought to really play well with our “conservative allies” in Southwest Asia.
And I’m sure this post is being recorded on “the chart.” Oh, and watch out Jews, Kristallnacht 2 is previewing in a country near you!
Filed under: Government, Morality, Politics, Presidential Election 2008 , International Relations, International Terrorism, Secretary of State
