What’s the definition of a racist? A conservative winning an argument. Ed West
Convicted murderers. Hate fomenters. Islamic lunatics. Ku Klux Klan members. What do they all have in common? Well, if you’re the UK Home Secretary, then Michael Savage is the common denominator.
Yes, if we thought Obama’s “thought police” were bad in this country (and they are), then Jacqui Smith epitomizes leftists gone wild!
Now if we reverse roles, can you think of a few scenarios that would result from someone on the right side of the political spectrum making the following statement?
“If people have so clearly overstepped the mark in terms of the way not just that they are talking but the sort of attitudes that they are expressing to the extent that we think that this is likely to cause or have the potential to cause violence or inter-community tension in this country, then actually I think the right thing is not to let them into the country in the first place. Not to open the stable door then try to close it later.”
For starters, let’s begin with with gay activists who’ve already engaged in a terrorist enterprise in California and nationwide RICO activities? How about the LULAC folks and the Hispanic organizations that advocate the return of California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas to Mexico? How about those who support eliminating gun ownership? Is there a “potential to cause…inter-community tension” if you support increased taxes to pay for non-productive welfare deadbeats, illegal immigrants, ACORN criminals, corporate giants, crooks at Fannie and Freddie, and Obama’s stimulus plan in general? Of course there is! However, the right would be and has been vilified in damning language for even broaching the subject of an open discussion on these topics.
In essence, the left hates freedom to dissent from its worldview. And it’s not just in the marketplace of ideas, but extends to the public classroom where opposition to teaching evolution as a scientific “law,” indoctrinating children into the homosexual agenda, and “kids are going to have sex anyway” mentality drives leftists to derisively address their ideologic opponents instead of engaging in substantive conversation.
The left is and always has been intolerant (think Soviet gulags and Siberia). The left does not even attempt to “fake” adherence to the values it espouses, but screams at those who dissent. And the UK’s Home Secretary is a classic example of leftist fascism.
Thus, the right has limited options. Americans who agree with pundits proclaiming national sovereignty, an end to illegal immigration, traditional marriage, voter ID laws, etc. can either capitulate to the left or fight. Unfortunately, fighting is rapidly being reduced to that of a physical nature because of the left’s stranglehold on the mainstream media, universities, public schools, legal profession, and law-making bodies. Without a voice to be heard, is it any wonder Americans have bought enough guns since Obama’s inauguration to outfit the Chinese Army twice over?
Recent Comments